Current:Home > MyGoogle begins its defense in antitrust case alleging monopoly over advertising technology -Wealth Empowerment Zone
Google begins its defense in antitrust case alleging monopoly over advertising technology
View
Date:2025-04-13 17:05:34
ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — Google opened its defense against allegations that it holds an illegal monopoly on online advertising technology Friday with witness testimony saying the industry is vastly more complex and competitive than portrayed by the federal government.
“The industry has been exceptionally fluid over the last 18 years,” said Scott Sheffer, a vice president for global partnerships at Google, the company’s first witness at its antitrust trial in federal court in Alexandria.
The Justice Department and a coalition of states contend that Google built and maintained an illegal monopoly over the technology that facilitates the buying and selling of online ads seen by consumers.
Google counters that the government’s case improperly focuses on a narrow type of online ads — essentially the rectangular ones that appear on the top and on the right-hand side of a webpage. In its opening statement, Google’s lawyers said the Supreme Court has warned judges against taking action when dealing with rapidly emerging technology like what Sheffer described because of the risk of error or unintended consequences.
Google says defining the market so narrowly ignores the competition it faces from social media companies, Amazon, streaming TV providers and others who offer advertisers the means to reach online consumers.
Justice Department lawyers called witnesses to testify for two weeks before resting their case Friday afternoon, detailing the ways that automated ad exchanges conduct auctions in a matter of milliseconds to determine which ads are placed in front of which consumers and how much they cost.
The department contends the auctions are finessed in subtle ways that benefit Google to the exclusion of would-be competitors and in ways that prevent publishers from making as much money as they otherwise could for selling their ad space.
It also says that Google’s technology, when used on all facets of an ad transaction, allows Google to keep 36 cents on the dollar of any particular ad purchase, billions of which occur every single day.
Executives at media companies like Gannett, which publishes USA Today, and News Corp., which owns the Wall Streel Journal and Fox News, have said that Google dominates the landscape with technology used by publishers to sell ad space as well as by advertisers looking to buy it. The products are tied together so publishers have to use Google’s technology if they want easy access to its large cache of advertisers.
The government said in its complaint filed last year that at a minimum Google should be forced to sell off the portion of its business that caters to publishers, to break up its dominance.
In his testimony Friday, Sheffer explained how Google’s tools have evolved over the years and how it vetted publishers and advertisers to guard against issues like malware and fraud.
The trial began Sept. 9, just a month after a judge in the District of Columbia declared Google’s core business, its ubiquitous search engine, an illegal monopoly. That trial is still ongoing to determine what remedies, if any, the judge may impose.
The ad technology at question in the Virginia case does not generate the same kind of revenue for Goggle as its search engine does, but is still believed to bring in tens of billions of dollars annually.
Overseas, regulators have also accused Google of anticompetitive conduct. But the company won a victory this week when a an EU court overturned a 1.49 billion euro ($1.66 billion) antitrust fine imposed five years ago that targeted a different segment of the company’s online advertising business.
veryGood! (221)
Related
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- UK police say they’re ‘overjoyed’ that British teen missing for 6 years has been found in France
- Chargers fire head coach Brandon Staley, GM Tom Telesco. Who is interim coach?
- Jake Paul vs. Andre August live updates: Start time, live stream, highlights, results
- The GOP and Kansas’ Democratic governor ousted targeted lawmakers in the state’s primary
- Court revives lawsuit over Connecticut rule allowing trans girls to compete in school sports
- South Korea scrambles jets as China and Russia fly warplanes into its air defense zone
- Arizona’s governor is sending the state’s National Guard to the border to help with a migrant influx
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- 'Reacher' star Alan Ritchson beefs up for Season 2 of a 'life-changing' TV dream role
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Putin says at news conference he hopes to find a solution on Americans Evan Gershkovich, Paul Whelan
- Fighting reported to be continuing in northern Myanmar despite China saying it arranged a cease-fire
- Lights flicker across NYC as brief power outage affects subways, elevators
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Horoscopes Today, December 15, 2023
- After 40 witnesses and 43 days of testimony, here’s what we learned at Trump’s civil fraud trial
- AP Week in Pictures: Global | Dec. 8 - Dec. 14, 2023
Recommendation
Tropical weather brings record rainfall. Experts share how to stay safe in floods.
Is the US Falling Behind in the Race to Electric Vehicles?
Salaam Green selected as the city of Birmingham’s inaugural poet laureate
Santa saves Iowa nativity scene from removal over constitutional concerns
Daughter of Utah death row inmate navigates complicated dance of grief and healing before execution
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore says Orioles lease at Camden Yards headed to a vote
2023 Arctic Report Card proves time for action is now on human-caused climate change, NOAA says
Chargers fire head coach Brandon Staley, GM Tom Telesco. Who is interim coach?